The Spoils scheme vs Civil Service
nasmu Uncategorized 1 Minute
Published by nasmu
Business owner and Republican Party organizer and activist. I am proudly advocating startups and small business development to replace the administrative state which has grown and replaced the entrepreneurial spirit in America. View all posts by nasmu
One thought on “The Spoils scheme vs Civil Service”
In the early 19th century, positions in the federal government were held at the pleasure of the president—a person could be fired at any time. The spoils system meant that jobs were used to support the American political parties, though this was gradually changed by the Pendleton Civil Service Reform Act of 1883 and subsequent laws. By 1909, almost two-thirds of the U.S. federal workforce was appointed based on merit, that is, qualifications measured by tests. Certain senior civil service positions, including some heads of diplomatic missions and executive agencies, are filled by political appointees. Under the Hatch Act of 1939, civil servants are not allowed to engage in political activities while performing their duties. In some cases, an outgoing administration will give its political appointees positions with civil service protection in order to prevent them from being fired by the new administration; this is called “burrowing” in civil service jargon.