Partisan political lines hinders solution to climate change


[ngg src=”galleries” ids=”3″ display=”basic_thumbnail”]


The Sunrise Movement has been pressuring the Democratic National Committee (DNC) to hold a #climatedebate. We agree! And we also think that just talking about fossil fuels and emissions reduction isn’t enough—the debate organizers need to give the regenerative agriculture solution equal time.


In June, hundreds of young people with the Sunrise Movement held a sit-in outside the Democratic Party headquarters in Washington, DC to demand a climate debate. They camped outside for three days demanding that the political and media establishment treat climate change like the emergency it is.


The pressure worked. The day after the sit-in ended, the DNC confronted internal pressure to hold a climate debate, and scheduled a vote on the issue. The vote will take place during the DNC’s national meeting, August 22-24, in California.


The Sunrise Movement is building a critical mass of support ahead of this vote. They need our help to get local and state party officials in every corner of the country to pledge to vote YES on the “Resolution to Request a Democratic Presidential Debate on the Climate Crisis.” 


Please sign our petition. Then take these additional steps:


  • Print out this pledge form and ask your local officials sign in support of the #ClimateDebate resolution.


  • Join a local effort to get DNC members in your area to sign on using the map at the bottom of this page.



The Sunrise Movement’s campaign has already achieved some success. On July 30, the Sunrise Movement in South County, Rhode Island reported with photos on Twitter that they had convinced DNC Chairman Joseph McNamara to sign the pledge.


Let’s keep the pressure on! Please sign our petition and join the Sunrise Movement campaign!

Sign the Petition

First name

Last name


ZIP Code



  United States  Canada  United Kingdom  Afghanistan  Åland Islands  Albania  Algeria  American Samoa  Andorra  Angola  Anguilla  Antarctica  Antigua and Barbuda  Argentina  Armenia  Aruba  Australia  Austria  Azerbaijan  Bahamas  Bahrain  Bangladesh  Barbados  Belarus  Belgium  Belize  Benin  Bermuda  Bhutan  Bolivia, Plurinational State of  Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba  Bosnia and Herzegovina  Botswana  Bouvet Island  Brazil  British Indian Ocean Territory  Brunei Darussalam  Bulgaria  Burkina Faso  Burundi  Cabo Verde  Cambodia  Cameroon  Cayman Islands  Central African Republic  Chad  Chile  China  Christmas Island  Cocos (Keeling) Islands  Colombia  Comoros  Congo  Congo, the Democratic Republic of the  Cook Islands  Costa Rica  Côte d’Ivoire  Croatia  Cuba  Curaçao  Cyprus  Czech Republic  Denmark  Djibouti  Dominica  Dominican Republic  Ecuador  Egypt  El Salvador  Equatorial Guinea  Eritrea  Estonia  Ethiopia  Falkland Islands (Malvinas)  Faroe Islands  Fiji  Finland  France  French Guiana  French Polynesia  French Southern Territories  Gabon  Gambia  Georgia  Germany  Ghana  Gibraltar  Greece  Greenland  Grenada  Guadeloupe  Guam  Guatemala  Guernsey  Guinea  Guinea-Bissau  Guyana  Haiti  Heard Island and McDonald Islands  Holy See (Vatican City State)  Honduras  Hong Kong  Hungary  Iceland  India  Indonesia  Iran, Islamic Republic of  Iraq  Ireland  Isle of Man  Israel  Italy  Jamaica  Japan  Jersey  Jordan  Kazakhstan  Kenya  Kiribati  Korea, Democratic People’s Republic of  Korea, Republic of  Kuwait  Kyrgyzstan  Lao People’s Democratic Republic  Latvia  Lebanon  Lesotho  Liberia  Libya  Liechtenstein  Lithuania  Luxembourg  Macao  Macedonia, the former Yugoslav Republic of  Madagascar  Malawi  Malaysia  Maldives  Mali  Malta  Marshall Islands  Martinique  Mauritania  Mauritius  Mayotte  Mexico  Micronesia, Federated States of  Moldova, Republic of  Monaco  Mongolia  Montenegro  Montserrat  Morocco  Mozambique  Myanmar  Namibia  Nauru  Nepal  Netherlands  New Caledonia  New Zealand  Nicaragua  Niger  Nigeria  Niue  Norfolk Island  Northern Mariana Islands  Norway  Oman  Pakistan  Palau  Palestine, State of  Panama  Papua New Guinea  Paraguay  Peru  Philippines  Pitcairn  Poland  Portugal  Puerto Rico  Qatar  Réunion  Romania  Russian Federation  Rwanda  Saint Barthélemy  Saint Helena, Ascension and Tristan da Cunha  Saint Kitts and Nevis  Saint Lucia  Saint Martin (French part)  Saint Pierre and Miquelon  Saint Vincent and the Grenadines  Samoa  San Marino  Sao Tome and Principe  Saudi Arabia  Senegal  Serbia  Seychelles  Sierra Leone  Singapore  Sint Maarten (Dutch part)  Slovakia  Slovenia  Solomon Islands  Somalia  South Africa  South Georgia and the South Sandwich Islands  South Sudan  Spain  Sri Lanka  Sudan  Suriname  Svalbard and Jan Mayen  Swaziland  Sweden  Switzerland  Syrian Arab Republic  Taiwan, Province of China  Tajikistan  Tanzania, United Republic of  Thailand  Timor-Leste  Togo  Tokelau  Tonga  Trinidad and Tobago  Tunisia  Turkey  Turkmenistan  Turks and Caicos Islands  Tuvalu  Uganda  Ukraine  United Arab Emirates  United States Minor Outlying Islands  Uruguay  Uzbekistan  Vanuatu  Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of  Viet Nam  Virgin Islands, British  Virgin Islands, U.S.  Wallis and Futuna  Western Sahara  Yemen  Zambia  Zimbabwe 



To: The Democratic National Committee

Climate change is too important to be squeezed into a few minutes of each Democratic Presidential debate. The question that will decide the fate of humanity was given less than 15 minutes during the six hours of the first debate, and just 21 minutes divided among 20 candidates in the second debate.


A climate-focused debate is necessary to delve into the full breadth of challenges the crisis presents and to fully reveal the depth of candidates’ understanding of the actions necessary to address this multifaceted crisis.


Without a climate-focused debate, candidates can cherry-pick brief talking points to make themselves sound well-informed and committed to taking action, while avoiding thorny subjects and neglecting to provide details on their proposals.


As members of the Organic Consumers Association, we’re very interested in hearing what candidates would do to encourage the transition from greenhouse gas-polluting industrial agriculture to carbon-sequestering regenerative organic agriculture. 


As supporters of the Green New Deal, we want to know what candidates would do to support family farming and ensure universal access to healthy food.  


Please pass Tina Podlodowski’s Resolution to Request a Democratic Presidential Debate on the Climate Crisis at the Full Body meeting in San Francisco on August 22-24, 2019. 


Then, hold a 2020 presidential primary debate focused on climate action—and make sure the debate organizers devote equal time to the issue of regenerative agriculture as a climate solution. Thank you.

One thought on “Partisan political lines hinders solution to climate change

Comments are encouraged

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.